Advertising February 14, 2012 | 9 Comments

Is This American Apparel Model Revealing A Shaved Pussy?

Years ago, American Apparel made headlines when they ran an ad featuring Sasha Grey revealing a bit of pubic hair (and more than a bit of boobs). Surprising, then, that this ad–which, if we’re not mistaken, showcases a model revealing a section of her hairless ladybits–has gone relatively unnoticed by the press. Well, here’s hoping we can change that…(American Apparel)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Author:Lux Alptraum

View all posts by Lux Alptraum →
  • Notpornjustsex

    I’m sure there’s a “soft, fluffy pussy” joke in there somewhere.

  • Dave The Vegan

    No it’s clearly white underwear for fuck sakes

    • http://fleshbot.com/ Lux Alptraum

      Uh, a) I don’t think it is, as I don’t see a crease at the thigh and she has seriously tan lines (as evidenced by the part of her breast that’s visible and b) even if we’re incorrect in our assertion, there’s no need to be nasty about it.

    • Dave The Vegan

      That’s because where it goes into the thigh is not visible, but the top of the underwear clearly presses into the skin. I was being nasty because it’s a lame stretch, that model at that shoot wouldn’t be fully nude  

    • http://fleshbot.com/ Lux Alptraum

      Nastiness is never justified.

    • hobsignrho

       *Rule 34*. So yes, she is naked under the robe. And also, this is Fleshbot so we shall assume it’s flesh and no panties unless “AA” the company release pictures without the robe…mwahahah (so rule 35).

  • Kawawakaba

    agreed Lux. Dave is a vegan and a douche

  • 94James Coleman

    It’s flesh colored panties , because if not she’s like a Barbie. But if you look close you see the Color change, and it’s not tan lines

  • 94James Coleman

    The only pussy showing is the one in her hand, lol. And you can see the panty line by her tummy