Fox Issues Cease And Desist Over “X-Files” Parody Porn

Been eagerly awaiting the arrival of “The X-Files: A Dark XXX Parody”? Don’t hold your breath: thanks to objections from Fox, that title will never see the light of day.

Instead, this fall will see the release of “The Sex Files: A Dark XXX Parody,” a film largely identical to “The X-Files: A Dark XXX Parody,” but with no “X-Files” trademark (and, we hear, totally renamed characters). But hey, as long as it involves a redheaded Kimberly Kane getting naked and dirty, does it really matter if it’s “The X-Files” or “The Sex Files” or “The XXX Files”?

We thought not.

· New Sensations Draws Fire From 20th Century Fox Over ‘X-Files’ Parody (more @ xbiz.com)
· Image via Kimberly Kane (blog.kanearmy.com)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Anonymous

    You had me super scared there for a second.

  • twophrasebark

    Mmmm… they need to get a better lawyer. They probably could have stuck with the original title. Parody is protected under the first amendment.

  • helloitabot

    MADTV did the XXX-files

  • helloitabot

    I know.

  • FrankN.Stein

    how could this film possibly do any more damage to the X-Files-franchise than “X-Files2″?

  • despisethesun

    Damn, that picture of Kimberly Kane as Scully is faptastic.

  • Anonymous

    The term “X-Files” isn’t parody, it’s an exact copyrighted name. “Sex files” is a parody, and that’s why they’re using it now.

  • Anthony_K

    Absolutely….nothing against Ashlynn Brooke at all, but you need someone who actually approximates Jennifer Marlowe in smarts and maturity.

    Too bad Vicky Vette no longer does features…she’d be perfect.

    Actually, Kagney Lynn Karter would have been a better pick , too.

    Anthony