American Apparel Ads Raise Feminist Ire, We Still Like Boobs

We’ve written before about our love for American Apparel and their many sexy ads (including some featuring our favorite pornstars). But it seems there are some who aren’t so keen on AA’s ad spread.

For instance: our distant cousin Jezebel, who ran a piece yesterday taking American Apparel to task for—well, a couple things, we guess. Underpaying amateur models, “sneaking” pornstars into advertisements (because they’re clearly not “real people,” unlike other AA models)… though the brunt of the article’s disdain seemed reserved for Susannah Breslin and Debauchette, two bloggers who have been chosen to showcase some of the company’s more risque ads on their websites. Apparently, housing the ads (and writing glowing posts about them) is akin to selling one’s soul.

For posterity, this is how we feel about the whole thing. Is American Apparel at times skeezy? Yes. Do they have questionable business practices? Sometimes. Do they produce clothes that are sweatshop-free, and pay their employees decent compensation (health insurance included)? Absolutely—which is far more than we can say for most companies we know.

On the balance, American Apparel seems no more or less shady than any other clothing company—but because they’re interested in pushing boundaries, in experimenting with sexuality, in (gasp!) putting nipples into their ads, they’re far more likely to draw attention (and raise a bit of ire in the process). Which is unfortunate, because it’s that daringness, that edginess, that—gasp!—nudity that actually makes us like them more.

Oh, and about those two bloggers? We approached them for comment.

Susannah Breslin:

I like the AA ads because they’re interesting. Most ads are shit. These provoke. AA isn’t afraid to go beyond the pale. And if that means some female bloggers get their knickers in a twist over exposed breasts and pubic hair, that probably says more about their relationship to their sexuality than it does about American Apparel.

Debauchette:

My general feeling is that, aesthetically, I like the jarring, raw look because it takes fashion ads, which are already sexual, strips away the gloss and amplifies the sexuality. I also love that they use adult performers in their ads. It blurs the line between fashion and pornography, which I think is great. Vogue, to me, is just porn for consumers and fashion fetishists.

And us? Well, we just like boobs.

· American Apparel Now Sponsoring Bloggers & Porn Stars (jezebel.com)

Tags: , , , ,

  • BeautifulAgony

    Boobs: 1 Feminists: 0

  • JStuder

    Seriously a site with the name Jezebel has no room to really call out AA on this one.

  • piggythewonderdog

    I am impressed with the ad. It’s actually quite beautiful, powerful & expressive. It’s utterly irrelevant whether or not they use “porn” models or whether they use Posh Spice or Lindsay Lohan.

    The use of nudity reflects our level of cultural tolerance. For example, various forms of nudity are common in European ads, while in the Middle East there are strict rules for women appearing in photographs. We here in America are somewhere in between and that causes confusion.

    Take this American Apparel ad for instance – how is this nudity any more salacious than something like the overtly sexual Posh & David Beckham ads for Giorgio Armani (w/ clothes)? Does the covering of a genital or a nipple mean that it’s automatically “not porn”, and conversely does the exposure of a genital or nipple automatically mean that it IS porn?

    That said, 3 cheers for Susannah Breslin and Debauchette for giving the ads a go.

  • Poop Cooper

    Thank God for Fleshbot. This article is what Jezebel would sound like if they weren’t so pretentious.

  • I.M.B.Y What’s THIS for…!

    I think the arguments about these ads and their artfulness are quite funny. Funny because the “art’ of it is no more creative then a cheap “sexy something or other ” catalog for Halloween. Like http://www.foreplaycatalog.com but with natural light. (Sure I like erotic photograhy, I check for the Gratuitous nude photo everyday.)

    I am sure am sure there are tons of people that object to these ads, but are the complainers feminists or Puritans?

  • Anonymous

    i like this ad more an other AA ads mainly because it actually advertises the product, not just the boobs. the product doesn’t get lost in the nudity.
    on the other hand, most of the AA products I’ve purchased hardly last through a few washes.

  • Anonymous

    I said this on Jezebel, but I was really struck by the Sasha Gray ad, with the pubes and the socks! I actually logged on and bought the dang socks!! I’m a visual chick, and I literally bought what AA was selling. Jezebel confuses my simple brain sometimes. On one hand it’s all about “I hate Sex and the City! And the Patriarchy!” and the other hand it’s all “I am a slut and proud of it, and I am drinkin my wine and we shouldn’t judge strippers!!” Sigh. I just liked the image, and it inspired me. Oh, and between the ad and Debauchette I am growing back in my bald bizness….

  • daprincess

    I hate feminist being used as an umbrella word for sex haters. I consider myself a feminist in that I believe women and men should be treated equally. I love sex, like boobies, beautiful women/men and believe in a woman’s right to do whatever the fuck she wants with her body. It’s hers. The only issue I have with the media and fashion in general is the double standards with regards to what’s “socially acceptable”
    1. It’s fashion, so it’s not porn.RIGHT. It’s still using sex/bodies to sell something. Yet kids have access to the pornographic material called “high fashion.” Give me a break.
    2. Where’s the naked cocks and man meat?! I want to see more hot male ass selling shit! I want to see the man’s face in porn. I want more men being objectified for my masturbatory pleasure. It’s only fair. :-D

  • hatey

    Jezebel is so incredibly frustrating.

    They lost me after a particularly “duh, shit” article about sex workers.

    And no one’s more of a feminist than I am.

  • daprincess

    meh. my computer is being wonky. i can’t “reply to this comment” so i’ll create a new one. i didn’t say “i hate feminist being used as an umbrella word for sex haters” as a commentary on your post title, Lux. It seems glaringly obvious to me that you are an intelligent,empowered feminist who has fun and enjoys sex. my comment was really more similar to hatey and I.M.B.Y. fa…better’s sentiments. in that, women some places feel that they are automatically disempowered by enjoying tits, fucking for pleasure, enjoying the beauty of the human form, being in porn, etc…it’s horrible that something so intrinsic to who we are (sex in its infinite manifestations) is trying to be taken away by our captors and our liberators.

    oh. and the kids. keep the nekked away from babies.