“Californication” Is Boring, Except When There Are Boobs

“Californication,” the show that probably didn’t make David Duchovny a sex addict, has a lot of sex in it. After all, it is about a sex addict — and isn’t that all those people think about anyway? Nevertheless: even though it’s full of sex, the show somehow manages to be boring, at least during the parts that don’t feature a topless Brooke Banner. So what’s a viewer to do? If using TiVo to fast forward to the naked good parts is too much work, point your browser to “Californication Girls,” a site that’s slowly accumulating all the worthwhile clips in the show. Because why should you sit through a thirty minute show for four minutes of boobs? (Though come to think of it, we’ve done more for less.) · Californication Girls (californicationgirls.com) · Sex arouses little interest in Showtime’s ‘Californication’ (nydailynews.com)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • bdve

    On the other hand, HBO’s True Blood has both vampires and tons of (soft-)sex.

  • DCypher

    I have to agree. Watched the Season 2 premiere last night after Dexter….YAWWWWWWNNNNN….lolz. More tits please!

  • dirtybacon

    I wasn’t totally in love with the season premiere – maybe Duchovny’s bad boy character isn’t fun when combined with monogamy? – but last season was great (except for that shitty happy-ending)

    But, on the boob side, would I like this show without all the jubblies? Probably, I think the character is fascinating… but the episode with the fountain-to-the-face shot was really got me sold.

  • Anonymous

    It hard to not like a show that breaks into stat rape the first episode. Lux, why do you find it boring?

  • Anonymous

    again if this is a double post please ignore. Its hard not to like a show that starts off its first episode with the subject of stat rape. why dont you like it lux?

  • se.blackheart

    Have to disagree with you Lux, Californication is a good show, with or without girls showing their cans.