July 8, 2008 | 3 Comments

Christie Brinkley is blaming her nasty, high-profile tabloid divorce on her “deviant” husband and his porn addiction, but the brave New York Daily News isn’t buying it! To prove that porn isn’t to blame, they asked the opinion of totally unbiased observers … like Hillary Scott and Joanna Angel! (But seriously, going online to ogle pictures of sexy, half-naked ladies? What a creep!) (nydailynews.com)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Author:Dashiell

View all posts by Dashiell →
  • MalzyWheels

    This is sad. It has made me reevaluate if it would be worth it to hook up with somebody who is totally hot, if she was a total psycho. In the other words: Would the happy fun ride be worth the cost of the unlimited ticket.

    And for a musical reference, I would have to go with The Offspring’s “She’s Got Issues.”

  • hodayathink is walking in the glow of love

    It’s not so much the porn that made him a bad husband, it’s the amount he spent on it without telling his wife. I don’t care how rich you are, spending $1500-$3000 a month on porn (and not letting your spouse know about it) is ridiculous. And the screwing around on her probably wasn’t a good idea either.

  • Come a little Miroslav Klose You’re My Kind of Man

    @hodayathink: I like neo-noir lesbians: Exactly. Couple that with personal, solo, webcam productions, & you have a real problem.

    & since the one mistress was seventeen when she was hired, but not, possibly, when first done, I am wondering when Chris Hansen will show up on the stand, as witness for Brinkley.