June 16, 2008 | 6 Comments

An underboob may not be the same as a sideboob (much less a full boob), but it still involves a boob. So this salute to what’s underneath by the always on-top-of-things Britney at Chicktrainer should make you feel like you’re on top too. Or maybe you prefer to stay down below? (chicktrainer.com)

Tags: , ,

Author:Dashiell

View all posts by Dashiell →
  • Anonymous

    I, for one, prefer underboob (when shot from below) to sideboob–much, much sexier.

  • Lux Alptraum

    @PCBHo: Totally agree.

  • Anonymous

    Same here. There’s just something so much more sexual about it. I think it’s the perfect oval some of them form. I dunno.

  • Lux Alptraum

    @Guitar_Wolf: It’s like upskirt only better because it’s boobs?

  • beelzebuddha

    Underboob all the way… however, you’re much less likely to sneak a peek at a woman’s underboob than a sideboob.

  • Come a little Miroslav Klose You’re My Kind of Man

    @Lux Nightmare: I would argue it is arithmetically perfect. Just look at the course of a female’s bust-curve, when the female is bent at the waist, her legs & trunk at a perpendicular. What does such a curve resemble? Why, of course; the graph of y=x^4. Two parabolae, conjoined by a third turn — two smiles across the bow of irregularity. The female bust is a lovely sight to behold… Even better from below, or up, shirt, to see the calculus of the teat.