April 28, 2008 | 4 Comments

2008_04_28_cyrus.jpgPervs that we are, even we can’t see what the brouhaha is over that reasonably tasteful “nude” photo of Miley Cyrus by Annie Leibovitz in the new Vanity Fair that seems to have certain Disney executives’ panties in a bunch. Wait a few years until she starts swapping nude cellphone pics with her costars and then there’ll be something to worry about. (NY Times)

Tags: , , , ,

Author:jonnobot

View all posts by jonnobot →
  • DontFearTheReaper

    Any publicity is good publicity. So look for more “candid” photos of miley to “accidently” find their way onto the intar-tubes.

  • cypherpunk

    That’s Disney and the MSM! Always ready to guarantee another generation of market-enabling self degradation in women! After all, women were made to hate themselves, and sexual things are icky, right? Right?

    sigh.

    If a great corruptor of souls exists, we are already in his sway. Beauty must be hidden and joy smothered.

  • Come a little Miroslav Klose You’re My Kind of Man

    Leibowitz should have combined the Miley Cyrus shoot with the Gisele/LBJ (I mean, LeBron) Kultur Kong shoot. More controversy guaranteed than would be if TMZ had video of Amy Weinstein snorting heroin off a dog carcass at a Bad Newz Kennelz event attended by Roman Polanski & shot by John Waters.

  • 1000101 is not a number. He’s a free man!

    You’d think after the whole Spears-Lohan stuff, publicity professionals would think it might be best to try something different… wait, how many copies of “Gimmie More” were sold off iTunes?

    Here we go again.