The Curious Case Of Client No. 9: An Honest To Goodness Political Sex Scandal

The Curious Case Of Client No. 9: An Honest To Goodness Political Sex ScandalWhile the world waits to see whether he’ll resign or not, media commentators, politicians, and even prostitutes are all theorizing, debating, and psychoanalyzing New York Governor Eliot Spitzer. The (formerly) rising political star with presidential ambitions has been identified as the target of a federal prostitution investigation that may leave him open to several serious criminal charges. It’s still not clear whether he will be indicted or forced to resign and the talk has ranged from how to pay for hookers to the rules of impeachment to the Mann Act to Hillary Clinton’s campaign strategy. But there’s one big question that every single person is asking: How dumb is Eliot Spitzer?

As a former state attorney general, Spitzer was extremely well-versed in the law and (more importantly) how law enforcement works—federal investigation techniques, wiretapping, complex money laundering manuvers. He even prosecuted several high profile prostuitution investigations cases himself, so it’s baffling that he would not only partake of the company of ladies of the night, but that he apparently made almost zero effort to conceal his actions. The most interesting revelation is that he was not a high-profile client caught up in a prostitution racket; the call girls were the ones who got caught up in an investigation of him. It was his own bank that tipped off the IRS about suspicious transactions, which eventually lead to the bust of the Emperor’s Club last week.

The Curious Case Of Client No. 9: An Honest To Goodness Political Sex Scandal

Oh yeah, there’s also the hookers. Everyone seems to be delighting in the screenshots of headless torsos and “diamond” ratings and interpretations of antiquated federal laws, but mostly they seem to enjoy the opportunity to call people “whores” in polite company. Because it’s about sex, you see, and we have to pretend that it’s dirty and evil, even though we all secretly get a big kick out of it because we all realize that the greatest harm done so far is that a young woman was “transported” across state lines for immoral purposes. (Oh, and he maybe liked to bang prostitutes without condoms, but that’s a different scandal altogether.) Our dream of a sex-positive governor leading the fight against harsh and outdated criminal laws will probably not come to pass, but we are pleasantly surprised that this case has led at least a few people to ask why prostitution is illegal in the first place.

There’s been a lot of comparisons to sex scandals past and how remarkably easy it’s been for most politicians to hang on and save their careers, but there’s one key difference between those earlier offenders and Spitzer. He paid for it. Cheating on your wife is forgivable, but a tough on crime crusader breaking the law is not. The consensus seems to be that indictment or no (the real unfairness with prostitutions laws is that it’s very difficult and rare to prosecute johns, although they pretty much have this one dead to rights), Spitzer will not be the governor for long. That’s too bad, because the longer this discussion goes on and the more we realize that anyone can and will pay for sex, the greater the chance that our attitudes and our laws might actually change. Of course, that also means all the horrible “Spitzer Swallow” jokes will continue indefinitely, but we suppose you can’t have everything.

· Revelations Began in Routine Tax Inquiry (nytimes.com)

· Spitzer’s Apology Video + Did One Of These Ladies Take Down the Governor? (Gawker)

· Spitzer Linked To Hooker Probe (thesmokinggun.com)

· “Why is prostitution illegal?” (slate.com)

· “Have you been a whore?” (wakingvixen.com; see also “The World’s Oldest Profession” audio @ wnyc.org)

· “Eliot Spitzer’s Whores” (Wonkette)

· Foes push for Spitzer’s resignation over link to prostitution ring (cnn.com)

· Washingtons most infamous hotel room for now (Examiner.com)

· Clinton Campaign Removes Eliot Spitzer’s Name From List Of Endorsements (radaronline.com)

· Sex scandals in U.S. politics (reuters.com)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Justin K. Rivers

    Silda’s a gorgeous woman. He must have some crazy kink she’s not into.

  • jeffbot

    As overwhelmingly stupid as Eliot Spitzer was … once everyone banishes the mental image of him with his clothes off … doesn’t it seem scary and odd that according to the august NY Times, this all started because ” … investigators conducting a routine examination of suspicious financial transactions reported to them by banks found several unusual movements of cash involving the governor of New York …”

    We know this was about thousands of dollars, not millions. Just how “routine” was it for banks to examine the records that they did? It seems more than plausible that they were looking for anything on Spitzer. I don’t see any other cocks on the block.

  • Richard Blakeley

    @jeffbot: I agree with you but it doesn’t change the fact he did it and he shouldn’t have.

  • jeffbot

    @blakeley: A given. And he is clearly going to lose his job for paying to have sex with someone. Acknowledged, it’s a special sort of job, and perhaps he deserves to lose it for hypocrisy alone.

    But this smells more like J. Edger Hoover than anything I’ve seen in government for … oh, at least a week or two.

    I went to try to look up FBI statistics on prostitution and found this right away:

    “Customers are not included in FBI statistics for prostitution arrests. Prostitutes are more often sentenced, and receive more severe sentences, than …”

  • ThereMustBeAPony

    what IF his wife knew and simply turned a blind eye to the prostitution thing? or encouraged him? “take your nasty anal sex elsewhere, i don’t care … and I don’t want to know about it”. the only thing “wrong” about this is his hypocracy, and the bullshit laws (crossing state lines, illegal sex trade … what a bunch of crap) … all the “cheating/betraying” stuff is just moralizing and speculation … maybe they haven’t had sex in 10 years! wouldn’t be the first marriage that became a “working partnership” with no intimacy … check out Ashley Madison …

  • Prof_Derzshowitz

    See, this is what happens when you hang out with the Clintons too much [and I don't mean the Clintons of the Parliament Funkadelic variety; I mean the other ones].

    All joking aside, while I believe that it’s somewhat useless to endlessly speculate about Spitzer’s motives in availing himself of the services of the “Emperor’s Club,” I think that to equate his lack of discretion in his actions, and his failure to develop some kind of cover story to hide his involvement in the sex ring, as somehow being an example of his “stupidity,” completely misses the mark.

    Spitzer is a Princeton and Harvard Law School graduate. While he does come from a wealthy family, which would make gaining admission to the elite University system somewhat easier, the last time I checked, to get into, and graduate, from Harvard Law would require at least some mixture of hard work, intelligence, and persistence.

    My reading of this situation would be that Spitzer, perhaps only at some unconscious level, hoped to be caught.

    As Mr. Bennett points out above, Spitzer is well-versed in all modes of legal espionage, wire-tapping, etc. through his work as D.A., and later, after being elected governor [largely on a puritanical "moral values" campaign ticket] it is quite obvious that the Governor would have been aware of the political and ethical ramifications if his involvement in a high-priced prostitution ring were ever to become public.

    And yet, he still made that decision, and did so (apparently), on more than one occasion.

    And he also (allegedly) engaged in some pretty kinky, non-vanilla type stuff as well:

    {From The T.O. STAR, March 11, ’08}

    “According to court papers, an Emperor’s Club agent was told by the prostitute that her evening with Client 9 went well. The agent said she had been told the client “would ask you to do things that … you might not think were safe … very basic things,” according to the papers, but that Kristen responded by saying, “I have a way of dealing with that … I’d be, like, listen dude, you really want the sex?”

    [www.thestar.com]

    While this is purely speculative, I would imagine that as some type of reactionary maneouver to rebel against his ethical “Mr. Clean” public image, and his political platform of being “tough on crime” [which has both helped his ascension through the halls of power, but has also made him a target of much public enmity], Spitzer decided to start paying some sexy young call-girls for a few nights of fun, and did nothing to cover up the story, perhaps hoping that he’d one day get busted.

    And while, (of course) the Republicans will continue to call for his resignation, seeing as they are quite clearly the guardians of a higher level of morality…

    {From The T.O. STAR, ibid.}

    “He has to step down. No one will stand with him,” said Rep. Peter King, a Republican congressman from Long Island. “I never try to take advantage or gloat over a personal tragedy. However, this is different. This is a guy who is so self-righteous, and so unforgiving.”

    …the fact is that all this man really did is cheat on his wife.

    To be honest, given the numbers of pressures Spitzer has (probably) faced, first as D.A., then Governor and then governor, and the fact that his lawyer wife also looks like a total frosty-box, I can’t really blame him for wanting to go for something on the side.

    I would say his first mistake was campaigning on a moral values/ethics ticket in the first place. Because the reality is, people are fallible, and if you build yourself up by relentlessly pointing out the lack of “moral fibre” of others, when you finally make a mistake, (especially a public one), well, you’re fucked.

    But I think that to make such a big deal about Spitzer’s “horrible” sex-crime is nothing more than American puritanism once more rearing it’s ugly head.

    And finally, I also seem to remember another smooth-talking politician, from about a decade or so ago, who similarly got busted for a little extra-marital dalliance.

    And despite the fact the he quite clearly publicly got nailed for what he did [i.e. busting a nut on a dress, finding novel uses for cigars, etc.], he managed to talk his way out of the situation [using the player's classic rule of thumb, "deny, deny, deny"], keep his wife, and is still a [somewhat] well-respected and powerful figure in American politics.

    An old Pierre Trudeau quote comes to mind in this instance: “There’s no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation.”

    Well, I think that holds true for not just the populace, but the politicians as well.

    Spitzer will probably resign his position, take a sabbatical, and try to repair his relationship with his family in the wake of this crisis. But to be honest, he shouldn’t have to.

    Perhaps I’m just too nostalgic, but I kind of preferred the “good old days,” when politicians would tend to be elected as based upon their intelligence, their experience, their opinions, and their work record, not just on their public image, as developed by teams of advertising executives, corporations, and public relations firms.

    If the man has done a good job in office [I'm not sure if he has or not, but I imagine that he is the hard working type], then who cares if he went off and fucked some skank?

    Clearly, being publicly regarded as horn-dog hasn’t hurt Governor Schwarzenneger’s political career. I don’t see why it should be the nail in the coffin for Spitzer’s.
    _____________

  • jeffbot

    @Prof_Derzshowitz: What was that, again?

  • Prof_Derzshowitz

    @jeffbot:

    oh shit… did I forget to hit “submit comment?”

    should I try and enter my essay on this page all over again?

    {i would hate it if anybody missed out on reading my latest enormous, boring, and incredibly long-winded rant on American politics, ethics, and puritanism, in light of these “shocking” new revelations RE: Gov. Spitzer’s preference for high-priced fuck-buddies}.

  • Dashiell Bennett

    @quirkusmaximus: What was that about being patronizing?

  • Prof_Derzshowitz

    @Dashiell, vis a vis quirkus:

    Good call. Isn’t everybody kind of, sort of paying for sex when they take someone out, invest their time in them, court them, wine and dine them, and then end up getting laid at some point as a result?

    RE: Spitzer.

    Have revised my hypothesis. Apparently this is quite a bit more than just a one-time error in judgment [apparently the gov. paid upwards of $80,000 throughout his patronage of the Emperor's club], and is a perfect example of the type of moral hypocrisy over sex that is so endemic in politics today.

    If anything, if Spitzer manages to spin his way out of being prosecuted, let alone being impeached, then this seems like a good opportunity for New Yorker’s to reexamine the validity of their outmoded sex laws.

    ___

    Go Lieut. Gov. David A. Patterson!

  • Violet Blue

    *really* nice wrap and coverage, Dash. I saw Gawker linked this one, attributing “our brothers at Fleshbot” so I figured it wasn’t Lux (or myself, obvs.) — but this is the clearest state of the state, so to speak. I’m just curious about “client 9″ and his prefs, and this helps — so far we know: no condoms (yikes), medium build young women… still, *so* not as exciting as Bush’s notoriously anti-condom crusading “AIDS Czar” Randall Tobias who (according to DC Madam records before Tobias’ resignation) “preferred Central American women.”

  • Anonymous

    @jeffbot good point…Cui Bono? He ran on a “clean up albany” platform…perhaps he was getting too close…

  • Anonymous

    “anyone can and will pay for sex” speak for yourself, buddy. I love sex as much as the next guy, but I won’t even go to strip clubs due to their patronizing nature. Paying for actual sex is beyond the limits of even that.

  • Come a little Miroslav Klose You’re My Kind of Man

    Spitzer needs to break out the “Pete Townsend Defense”. When PT was busted for having child porn — or qurOn as the hipper among us seem to refer to it — he stated that it was research for an autobiography he was writing. Similarly, Spitz could say he was doing research for a prostitution law re-write that was coming up the pike. Would be as believable, but the thing would still blow over.

  • Anonymous

    That call girl just got offered $1 Million to do a porno>

    [www.videobox.com]