January 15, 2008 | 2 Comments

2007_02_14_nyccondom.jpgTo condom or not to condom? ‘Tis a question all porn companies have to face—even if more often than not, no condoms wins out. ABC News takes a long, hard look at this penetrating issue. Hey, that’s one way of justifying sending your news crew to Las Vegas to hang out at a porn convention. (abcnews.go.com; more on NYC Condoms here)

Tags: , , , , ,

Author:Lux Alptraum

View all posts by Lux Alptraum →
  • Conrad

    There needs to be more visual of condoms in both porn and “mainstream” movies. Though mainstream will be harder because showing penis somehow means R, or NC-17, where as porn it’s a given (if there is a penis in the porn). Non Penis porn could do just as well to show proper toy sharing, but that may be too advanced for some studios.

    The 70s and 80s porn was nice when it started with a public service announcement about condom use, at least they were trying a little even if they weren’t practicing it themselves.

  • I.M.B.Y What’s THIS for…!

    True. But there isn’t even a need to show the cock. If they wanted too they could show some one take out a rubber and grin, or wink, or whatever