Flesh Flicks: Belladonna Celebrates Our Legal Heritage

2007_06_12_ff_bella.jpg

Today marks the 40th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court decision in “Loving vs. Virginia,” which declared all bans against interracial marriage to be unconstitutional. You would think that after all this time, that would also mean that a black man and a white woman (or vice versa) could fuck on camera without it being considered a “niche” or “fetish” title. We’ve already lamented the rather backwards attitude the adult industry has when it comes to promoting racial harmony, but today is a nice reminder that the rest of our society (most of it anyway) has moved on. Maybe someday, instead of labeling clips like this “Belladona fucking a black dude,” it can just be described as “Belladonna fucking a dude.” Or maybe a couple of dudes and another girl? Hey, we’re all about progress here.

- – -

· “Interracial Fuck” (Shufuni)
· “Interracial marriage, 40 years later” (desmoinesregister.com)
· Loving v. Virginia (Wikipedia)

* * * * *

Previously: “Why Interracial Porn is Stupid” (And Why We Agree), Flesh Flicks Archives

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • Dimension

    Classy way to bring together Constitutional law and smui

  • Dimension

    @Dimension: What I meant to say was: Classy way to bring constitutional law and smut together!

    But I always type one handed when Chief Justice Warren is writing for the majority.

  • Gram Ponante

    Better yet, how about Tab A Goes into Slot B? Let’s take it as seriously as possible; it’s sexier that way.